Recent
Litigation Successes
Securities Arbitration/Litigation
- The firm has successfully battled numerous disputes by or on behalf of broker/dealers, investment banks, venture capital firms and hedge funds.
- On behalf of brokerage firms, the firm has successfully obtained legal fees in cases sought by Claimants against said firms.
- The Firm successfully defended hundreds of customer/brokerage firm securities arbitrations on behalf of brokerage firms.
- The firm also successfully won or settled significant claims against major brokerage houses on behalf of customers.
- Successful in actions by brokerage firms against former officers/employees for employment related issues in which the firm was victorious before arbitration panels.
- On behalf of brokerage firms, The Firm obtained numerous injunctions and significant monetary damages in actions against former brokers.
- The Firm successfully defended enforcement actions brought by self-regulatory organizations against broker-dealers and registered representatives. Have also successfuly had brokers re-admitted to the business after being statutorily disqualified under the rules of the NASD, NYSE and SEC.
Back to top
Commercial Litigation:
- Successfully defended various employment related litigations
both in court and arbitration involving covenants not to
compete, covenants not to solicit, payments on employment
notes, terminations for cause and related issues: Special
Counsel v. Howard Sloan (Summer 2004); Slavens v. Bank of
New York Securities (Fall 2004).
- Successfully settled multi-party dispute before the New
York State Courts involving the receipt of brokerage commissions
over sale of commercial properties in Westchester, New York:
Granowitz v. Friedland Realty (Winter 2004-05).
- Successfully settled dispute involving trade secret/confidentiality
issues and claims of fraudulent inducement, fraudulent representation
and breaches of contract before the American Arbitration
Association: W.P.P. v. WebRecruiter (Fall 2004).
- Successfully commenced and tried fraudulent conveyance
action before the New York State Supreme Court, County of
New York on behalf of estate against family members and
was also victorious on the appeal: Estate of Goldman v.
Goldman (Winter 2000 – Fall 2004).
- Successfully prosecuted three week jury trial before the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York on behalf of re-biller of long distance telephone
services against what was then one of the largest telephone
communication companies in the world: MTX v. MCI Worldcomm
(Spring 2002).
- On behalf of Austrian and German concentration camp and
slave labor victims of the Holocaust, commenced a special
proceeding against attorneys who recovered up to $40 million
in legal fees representing those victims, requesting that
those monies be returned to the victims: In Re: Zeisel Holocaust
Litigation (Summer 2001 – Spring 2003).
- In a decision that has obtained national prominence,
successfully had the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York dismiss a multi-million dollar
shareholder litigation against a publicly traded company
and its investment banker: Vogel v. Conseco (Winter 2002).
- Successfully defeated motion to certify a class before
the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey brought by shareholders which sued the company, its
officers and directors, accountants and investment banker
on various federal securities law claims in connection with
an IPO: In Re: Jasmine Shareholder Class Action (Fall 1998
through Winter 2003).
- Successfully convinced class of shareholders to dismiss
claim against investment banking firm in multimillion dollar
class action: In Re: United States Office Products (Fall
2001).
- Successfully tried, before a Justice of the Supreme Court,
County of New York, a contractual dispute between public
company and alleged contractual parties: Fidelity v. S & L (Winter 2002).
- Successfully defended two week jury trial before the
Supreme Court, State of New York, County of New York, brought
by former employer of career training center for, among
other things, violation of a covenant not to compete, raiding
and pirating of intellectual property: American Careers
v. National Careers (Summer 2001).
- On behalf of former employees and start up internet marketing
company, successfully defended against action seeking to
prohibit employees and their company from competing with
internationally recognized media conglomerate: Bloomberg
Inc. v. Swivelhead, et al (Winter 2001).
- On behalf of two partnerships, successfully recovered
approximately $1,000,000 on a loan against accounting firm
for debtor company that filed for bankruptcy: Trigger v.
Medcentrix (Winter 2001).
- Successfully represented one of the largest clothing/jean
manufacturers, distributors, importers, wholesalers and
retailers in dispute against another large clothing company
regarding intellectual property rights, contractual breaches,
disputes within the Board of Directors and other torts:
Guess?, Inc. v. Jordache, Inc.
- Represented four of eight members of the Board of Directors
in dispute that created deadlocke
d Board and compelled the creation of a ninth member of
the Board to resolve all issues through litigation and appeal:
Command Securities, Inc. v. Robinett.
Back to top
Entertainment Litigation:
- Currently represent major record label in dispute over
lost negatives of the “B-52s” which include
the negative of the photograph of the band’s “Greatest
Hits” album cover: DuBose v. Warner Bros. Records
Inc.: (Fall 2004).
- Successfully obtained injunction against former employee
who, without any restrictive covenant, was restrained from
conducting business.
- On behalf of National Football League quarterback, commenced
action and successfully recovered all monies due and owing
plus 9% interest and costs from sports memorabilia company:
Peyton Manning v. Triumph Sports & Memorabilia Inc.
(Fall 2003).
- Represent sports marketing company in dispute over memorabilia
signed by Walter Peyton prior to his unfortunate premature
death.
- Successfully negotiated a resolution to dispute involving
Evander Holyfield boxing gloves.
- Successfully defended an eight day jury trial in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York,
on behalf of art graduate school relating to the loss, destruction
and wrongful copying of valuable sculptures and other pieces
of fine art: Stuart Pivar v. The Graduate School of Art
for the New York Academy of Art (Winter 2002).
- Successfully dismissed litigation brought by promoter
against hip-hop band and its artists: In Re: Total (2002).
- Successfully resolved dispute over videotaping of celebrity
wedding: Michael Douglas & Catherine Zeta Jones v. Martinez
(Winter 2002).
- Represented major boxing promoter in litigation over
promotion revenues earned by Ike Quartey, former WBA welterweight
champion of the world: Main Events Promotions v. AB Stars
Boxing Promotions (2001).
- Represented largest United States private sports silent
auction house in litigation over authenticity of the first
trophy baseball: Forester v. Robert Edwards Auctions (Summer
2002).
- Represented sports memorabilia company in contractual
dispute over, among other things, marketing and producing
baseball card shows.
- Successfully tried matter before a jury in the New York
State Supreme Court involving rap artist P. Diddy (f/k/a
Puff Daddy) and “Shine,” his bodyguard: Steinmetz
v. “Shyne” and Reebok Sports Center, Inc. Fall
2002).
- Represented National Football League in dispute over
production rights and marketing of Tae Kwan Do tournament:
NFL Films, Inc. v. Shin Production.
- Represented major movie production company in litigation
involving the film “Turk 182.”: Cegana v. Twentieth
Century Fox Film Corp.
- Represented major movie production company in dispute
over the rights to profits from all creative works that
evolved from the movie “Mash,” including “Trapper
John, M.D.,” “After Mash” and related
works: Preminger v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
- Victorious on a motion to dismiss claim brought by recording
studio against movie/ Broadway production company: Unplugged
Management Group v. The Lion King Production Company.
- Represented major record label in successfully dismissing
action by independent record label: Humphrey Music v. Warner
Bros. Records Inc.
- Represented film production company in connection with
real estate dispute: Tribeca Restoration v. Big Dog Films.
- Represented record production company in real estate
litigation: Cohen v. Tin Pan Apple Records.
Back to top
Employment Representations:
- Represent employers/employees in connection with the employees joining the employer. Such representation has included senior officers, directors and shareholders of both public and private companies.
- Representation of employers and employees relating to the departure of the employees. Such representation includes negotiating and/or litigating over severance packages, golden parachutes, repayment of loans and a variety of post employment related issues.
- Litigation of both sides of hundreds of post-employment related issues, including covenants not to compete, non-solicitation agreements, post-employment consulting agreements, finding agreements, misappropriation of alleged confidential materials, trade secrets, unfair competition and raiding issues.
- Litigation of post employment emergency relief issues in connection with seeking an opposing temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions and gathering evidence and proving issues in order to obtain/oppose said relief.
- Representation of both employees and companies in cases involving age, sex, pregnancy, racial, and ethnic discrimination before the federal and state courts in New York. Said representations include prosecuting and defending claims before the EOCC through trial or arbitration of the action.
Back to top
Enforcement:
- Representation of registered representatives, principals, compliance personnel, branch office managers, control persons and officers and directors in connection with audits, inquiries, investigations, enforcement hearings, appeals settlements and Acceptance, Waiver and Consents of the SEC and FINRA.
- Representation of individuals, partnerships and corporations under investigation by the SEC in connection with various alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Acts of 1933 and 1934.
Back to top |